Home
Doctors Pricing Compare FAQ Book a Consultation
ENES
Curved shelving niche and bouclé ottoman at Dear Clinic Cheongdam, where filler plans are discussed before a carton is chosen
Dear Clinic · Compare · Belotero vs Juvederm
A German cohesive family against an American cross-linked range

Belotero Filler vs Juvederm in Korea

Both sit on the same shelf in Cheongdam, published at ₩300,000 and ₩400,000 per cubic centimetre. One is built to disappear into tissue at whatever density it meets; the other is built as a graded range with a firm end. The plane you are treating chooses between them.

Both families stocked here Quoted per cc Open 365 days
Ask Which One Your Area Needs See The Table
The Short Answer

What separates Belotero from Juvederm

Both are cross-linked hyaluronic acid and both are reversible. Belotero, made by Merz in Germany, is manufactured so the gel sits at varying densities inside tissue and blends with what surrounds it. Juvederm, made by AbbVie and Allergan, is a graded range whose firmer members hold shape under load. Integration against structure is the whole comparison.

Neither description is marketing shorthand invented for this page. Merz builds Belotero on a cohesive polydensified matrix, which is the reason the Korean product notes for the range emphasise how evenly it distributes through the skin and how rarely it leaves a palpable nodule. Juvederm is built on a cross-linking process the manufacturer patents, and the same Korean notes describe a viscous, firm gel supplied in different particle sizes so one range can serve several jobs.

What that means at a consultation is simple enough to state. Where the correction is shallow and the surrounding skin is thin, the gel that blends wins. Where the correction has to project something and carry the weight of tissue above it, the gel that resists deformation wins. The individual product page for each family goes further: Belotero at Dear and Juvederm at Dear.

Side By Side

Belotero and Juvederm, row by row

The second and third rows carry the argument. Everything under them follows from how each gel is manufactured.

 BeloteroJuvederm
Maker and originMerz, GermanyAbbVie / Allergan, United States
How the gel is builtCohesive polydensified matrix — a patented process that produces varying densities within one gel instead of uniform particlesA patented cross-linking process producing a viscous, firm gel, supplied in a graded range of particle sizes
What that behaviour gives youIntegration into the surrounding tissue with very little tendency to sit as a discrete lumpShape held under the weight of the tissue above it, with fine work possible from the softer members of the range
Lines within the familyFour lineups separated by their physical properties, so skin type and area select the memberA range whose particle size is matched to the area and to the kind of correction wanted
Anaesthetic in the syringeProduct dependent; confirmed for you from the carton actually openedThe Korean product notes state a lidocaine component in the gel, described by the maker as easing discomfort around placement
Planes used at DearMost often superficial and mid, where blending matters mostDeep and mid for structure, with softer members used higher
Planning unitWritten to 0.1 ccWritten to 0.1 cc
ReversibleYes — hyaluronic acid responds to a hyaluronidase injectionYes — the same enzyme applies
What you should expect afterwardsEntry-point bruising, short-lived swelling; superficial placement shows surface irregularity soonest if overdoneEntry-point bruising, short-lived swelling; deep placement shows as firmness before it settles
Published rate, per 1 cc₩300,000 (≈ $215)₩400,000 (≈ $285)

Both figures are per cubic centimetre and both are the same for a resident of Seoul and a visitor. Specialty placements carry their own rate whichever family is opened, the whole card sits on the published price list, and every gel stocked here is set out on the dermal filler category page. Peer-reviewed work on injectable hyaluronic acid measures precisely these manufacturing differences, which is why a properties table is more useful here than a brand argument.

Where Each One Is Opened

The corrections that call for a blending gel, and the ones that call for a firm one

Starting positions, all of them movable by your own scan.

CASE 01

Etched lines in thin skin

A crease sitting in the dermis under skin you can nearly see through is the textbook case for a gel that distributes instead of sitting as a mass. Firmness here reads as a ridge in side light, which is exactly the complaint people bring in after a shallow correction has been made with the wrong product.

CASE 02

Mid-face support that carries weight

Where the cheek has lost its platform, the gel underneath is holding everything above it. A firmer member of a graded range is the usual answer, and the cheek filler page sets out how the support is distributed.

CASE 03

A profile that needs projection

Chin and jawline work asks a gel to push against soft tissue and keep its outline for months. That is a structural job, and it favours the firm end of the Juvederm range over anything designed to melt into its surroundings. See the chin filler page.

CASE 04

The fold that is half shadow

A nasolabial crease is often two problems in one: a genuine dermal line plus a shadow cast by cheek descent. The line takes a blending gel, the shadow takes support behind it, and sometimes both families appear in one plan. Detail on the nasolabial page.

Case 04 is the one worth reading twice. A comparison page implies you must pick a winner, and a full-face design frequently uses more than one family across different planes in a single appointment. How that is sequenced is described on the full-face filler page.

The Lidocaine Question

What a lidocaine component in the syringe does and does not change

People ask about this before they ask about anything else, so it is worth being precise. The Korean product description for Juvederm states that a lidocaine component is present in the gel, and the manufacturer's position is that it eases discomfort around the injection itself. That is a property of the product on the shelf, and it is the kind of fact a comparison page should report plainly and then move on.

Three things it does not settle. It does not make an injection a non-event, because the needle passing through skin and the gel expanding tissue are separate sensations. It does not change which gel your plane calls for, and choosing a product for the ingredient instead of the correction is how people end up with the wrong material in the right place. And it does not describe what will be done for your comfort on the day, which depends on the area and on you.

Comfort measures during your session are confirmed at your consultation. Ask about them there, in the same conversation where the area, the volume and the published rate are agreed, and you will get an answer about your appointment instead of a statement about a carton.

Shared Risk

The risks both HA families carry into the same face

Nothing in the comparison above changes any of this. Anatomy does not care which carton was opened.

The ordinary reactions. Bruising at entry points, swelling that peaks then settles, tenderness, and small palpable lumps while a gel distributes. The lip and the under-eye swell and bruise most visibly. These are expected, and they are what a review appointment looks at.
Vascular events. Gel entering or compressing a vessel is rare and urgent for either family. Blanching as the gel goes in, pain climbing instead of easing, a dusky mottled patch over the following hours, or any change in vision means telephoning the clinic in the same hour, on whatever day it happens.
Placement that fights the plane. A firm gel too close to the surface can leave a ridge or a grey cast; a soft gel buried deep gives up its shape. Most disappointment with fillers traces back to this mismatch, which is why the plane is decided before the product is.
Infection and delayed lumps. Spreading redness with heat, or a nodule appearing late, is assessed, never waited out. Previous injectable material in the same region is disclosed at consultation, because adding volume on top of an unknown complicates everything that follows.
The reversible part. Both families are hyaluronic acid, so both respond to a hyaluronidase injection where the director judges it appropriate. The enzyme does not separate the part of a result you disliked from the part you were happy with, and it is held at the clinic for use at the director's judgement, with whatever applies explained to you first.

Where the examination finds laxity instead of lost volume, we do not recommend either gel for it and say what would actually answer the complaint, usually something from the lifting and tightening category. Active infection over the area, pregnancy and breastfeeding postpone an appointment entirely, and blood-thinning medication or a bleeding disorder changes what you should expect and sometimes the plan itself.

Before & After

A layered hyaluronic acid forehead case

One unretouched Dear case, shown with consent. The photograph records the correction, and it does not identify which family was used for it.

Forehead filler before and after at Dear Clinic — an evener contour across the central forehead after a layered hyaluronic acid plan
Forehead filler · evener contour across the central forehead

All photos are unretouched cases treated at Dear Clinic. Individual results may vary.

A forehead is a useful case for this comparison because it asks for both behaviours at once: volume placed deep enough to change the curve, and a surface smooth enough that no edge shows in raking light. The forehead filler page covers how the planes are divided.

Dear, Knowhow

Why this comparison is settled by your scan and not by our stock

01 — THE FULL ARSENAL

Four HA families share one trolley

Belotero and Juvederm are stocked alongside the Korean house family and a fourth imported range, so a recommendation here costs the clinic nothing either way. Where none of the four suits the finding, that answer is available too.

02 — DIAGNOSIS FIRST

EVE Muse reads the plane before a carton is chosen

Three-dimensional capture under five light sources with AI analysis, read beside a hands-on examination, is what separates thin skin over a dermal line from tissue descent casting a shadow. Those two findings want different gels.

03 — DIRECTOR-PERFORMED

One pair of hands reads, injects and reviews

Every injection here is director-performed, in increments as small as 0.1 cc, and the same doctor sees you afterwards. Recognising a change in tissue you placed yourself is faster than reading notes written by someone else.

In the clinic

The devices and hands behind this treatment

Belotero Soft, Balance, Intense and Volume filler cartons lined up, the four German lineups held at Dear Clinic Cheongdam
Four Belotero lineups, separated by physical properties rather than by area
Juvederm packaging as stocked at Dear Clinic Cheongdam, one member of the graded American hyaluronic acid range
One member of the Juvederm range; the graded sizes are what let it cover more than one plane
Medical Team

Five doctors, one standard

Director-performed treatment is a Dear promise — your procedure is planned and performed by the doctors below.

Dr. Jemin Kim — Medical Director and Founder, Dear Clinic
Dr. Jemin Kim
Yonsei University College of Medicine
Medical Director · Founder
Dr. Sanghyun Lee — Director, Dear Clinic
Dr. Sanghyun Lee
Seoul National University College of Medicine
Director
Board-certified · Family Medicine
Dr. Seonhaeng Lee — Director of Aesthetic Medicine, Dear Clinic
Dr. Seonhaeng Lee
Chosun University College of Medicine · Residency, Samsung Medical Center
Director, Aesthetic Medicine
Dr. Daeun Jung — Director, Dear Clinic
Dr. Daeun Jung
Ajou University College of Medicine
Director
Board-certified · Family Medicine
Dr. Woojae Jung — Director of Aesthetic Medicine, Dear Clinic
Dr. Woojae Jung
Seoul National University — B.S. in Medicine
Director, Aesthetic Medicine
Patient Reviews

What our patients say

Real verified reviews from our Google Business Profile.

4.9★★★★★ 310 Google Reviews
FAQ

Belotero against Juvederm, answered

Which is better, Belotero or Juvederm?
Neither, as a general statement. They are two manufacturing approaches to the same material: one built to distribute through tissue at varying densities, one built as a graded range with a firm end. The question that has an answer is which plane and which correction you are treating, and that is settled at the examination.
What do Belotero and Juvederm cost per cc in Cheongdam?
Belotero is published at ₩300,000 (≈ $215) and Juvederm at ₩400,000 (≈ $285), both per cubic centimetre. Specialty placements carry their own rate whichever family is opened, and the volume your area needs is agreed before a syringe is unwrapped.
Does Juvederm really contain lidocaine?
The Korean product notes state a lidocaine component in the gel, described by the maker as easing discomfort around placement. Treat it as a property of the product, not as a description of what will be done for your comfort on the day. That part is confirmed at your consultation and set to the area being treated.
Is Belotero better for the under-eye area?
Thin-tissue regions reward a gel that integrates, and that is the property Belotero is manufactured for. Whether any gel belongs under your eyes is a separate question that the scan answers, because that region shows a poorly chosen product as a ridge or a bluish cast. The under-eye page sets out the limits.
Can both be used in the same appointment?
Yes, and a full-face design often does exactly that, with one family giving deep support and another finishing the surface. Each cc is quoted at its own published rate, so a mixed plan is simply the sum of what was used, itemised before anything is opened.
Which one lasts longer?
Not something this page can answer for you. Longevity moves with the plane, the volume placed, how much the area moves and your own metabolism, and no figure printed on a website survives contact with those four variables. Your director gives you the expected range for your own plan at consultation.
Can either be dissolved if I dislike the result?
Both are hyaluronic acid, so both respond to a hyaluronidase injection. It is held at the clinic and used at the director's judgement, and what would be involved is explained to you before anything is done. It is a genuine safety net and it is a reason to be conservative at a first session.
Is the German product safer than the American one, or the other way round?
Country of manufacture is not a safety axis. Both are regulated hyaluronic acid devices and both carry the same vascular risk map, because the risk belongs to the face rather than to the carton. What changes outcomes is the plane, the volume and the hand placing it.
Why is Juvederm priced higher per cc here?
The card reflects what each imported range costs the clinic, and both figures are printed before you sit down. Price is not a quality ranking: a correction that suits a blending gel is served worse by the more expensive option, and your director will say so at the consultation.
I have filler from another treatment already. Does that change the comparison?
It changes the plan before the comparison begins. Unresolved material of unknown type in the same region is assessed first, because adding volume on top of an unknown is how a small problem becomes a complicated one. Bring whatever record you have of what was placed and when.
What if my problem turns out not to be volume at all?
Then we do not recommend either gel. Where the finding is laxity or skin quality instead of lost volume, filler is the wrong tool and you will be told that at the scan, with the lifting or booster route explained instead. Declining a syringe is part of the job here.
Can I be seen at a weekend, and is the rate the same as for Korean patients?
The clinic runs 365 days a year, weekends and public holidays included, and the two figures on this page apply regardless of nationality. English enquiries are answered as soon as possible, and the quote you receive in writing is the quote given at the desk.
Consultation

Bring the area, and let the plane pick the gel

Tell us which region you are considering, anything already injected there, and anything in your history touching bleeding or immunity. Answered in English as soon as possible.

Scientific Evidence

Indexed work behind comparing two hyaluronic acid families

Five indexed entries sit behind the statements above: a 2019 paper on the rheologic and physicochemical properties used to tell injectable hyaluronic acid products apart, two 2017 papers on facial danger-zone anatomy and on assessment and injection guidance for the upper face, a 2022 ophthalmology review of visual loss following aesthetic facial injection, and a 2016 review of hyaluronidase in aesthetic medicine.

Each is listed as title, journal and year with a verifiable DOI. None of them ranks one brand against another, no outcome figure from any of them is reproduced here, and none of them predicts what either gel will do in your own face.

  1. Fagien S, et al. Rheologic and Physicochemical Properties Used to Differentiate Injectable Hyaluronic Acid Filler Products. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. 2019. doi:10.1097/prs.0000000000005429
  2. Scheuer J, et al. Anatomy of the Facial Danger Zones: Maximizing Safety during Soft-Tissue Filler Injections. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. 2017. doi:10.1097/prs.0000000000002913
  3. de Maio M, et al. Facial Assessment and Injection Guide for Botulinum Toxin and Injectable Hyaluronic Acid Fillers: Focus on the Upper Face. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. 2017. doi:10.1097/prs.0000000000003544
  4. Kato J, et al. Visual loss after aesthetic facial filler injection: a literature review on an ophthalmologic issue. Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia. 2022. doi:10.5935/0004-2749.20220048
  5. Baker A. The use of hyaluronidase in aesthetic medicine: a literature review. Journal of Aesthetic Nursing. 2016. doi:10.12968/joan.2016.5.3.129

References are provided for information — outcomes vary by individual and are assessed at your diagnosis.

Book WhatsApp Call