The clinic was very professional from start to finish. Doctor Jung was excellent and gentle with the treatment. I felt well looked after and everyone was outstanding. Happy with my service!

Subcision is published at ₩500,000 (≈ $355) a visit, a standard-tip Potenza session at ₩250,000 (≈ $180), full-face CureJet at ₩500,000 (≈ $355), and ablative work at ₩10,000 (≈ $5) for each lesion treated. Your total is those units, counted after the scan.
That structure is the reason a scar figure cannot be given over a message before anyone has looked at your face. A quote here is a multiplication: which of the four units your pattern calls for, how many of each, spread over how many appointments. Two people with the same complaint can leave the consultation with totals that are nowhere near each other, because one has eleven countable lesions on the cheeks and the other has a tethered floor across the whole mid-face.
What each line does to a scar, and which shapes respond to which, is set out on the acne scar treatment page. This page stays on the money: the units, the arithmetic, the variables that move a total, and the things the four figures do not settle.
Read the middle column before the last one. The unit is what makes two totals differ, more than the figure beside it does.
| Published line | Unit of sale | What one unit buys | Listed rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subcision | One visit | Needle release of scar floors that are tied down to the tissue beneath them, worked across the areas identified at the scan | ₩500,000 (≈ $355) |
| Potenza, standard tip | One visit | Radiofrequency delivered through fine needles into the dermis, for scar walls and the coarse texture around them | ₩250,000 (≈ $180) |
| CureJet | One visit, full face | Needle-free jet delivery across the whole face in a single pass, priced as one field instead of by the zone | ₩500,000 (≈ $355) |
| CO2 or erbium laser | Each lesion | Focused ablative work on one marked scar at a time, counted and agreed before the handpiece is switched on | ₩10,000 (≈ $5) |
Korean won, with a dollar figure shown beside it as orientation only. The same four numbers are quoted whether your address is in Gangnam or abroad; nationality changes nothing on the card. Every other energy and laser line the clinic runs sits on the published price list, and the wider pigment and resurfacing menu is on the laser treatment category page.
Three counting rules, and a total is always some combination of them.
Subcision, the standard Potenza tip and CureJet each carry one figure for the appointment. Releasing four tethered scars and releasing nine in the same sitting is the same line on your bill. This is why a director will often gather scattered work into one longer visit instead of splitting it.
CO2 and erbium are counted one lesion at a time, so a face with a handful of deep pits and a face with forty behave completely differently on the sheet. The marking is done with you watching, the count is read back, and it is fixed before any energy is delivered.
Release, needle energy and ablative finishing are often wanted on the same day. When two lines run in one visit the two published figures simply add; there is no bundled rate that appears when they are combined, and equally nothing is withheld because they are.
Because the units are public, you can do the sum yourself before you arrive. A visit built from release plus needle radiofrequency is ₩500,000 and ₩250,000 added together; a visit that also marks six individual pits adds six times ₩10,000 on top. That is the whole method. No figure on your quote will have come from anywhere except this card.
All five come out of the examination. None of them come out of the calendar.
What does not move the figure: the day of the week, whether you book on a public holiday, how far you have travelled, or which director you are seen by. Those are fixed by the card and by the clinic opening 365 days a year.
A rate card answers one question precisely and several others not at all. These are the ones it leaves open, and each is dealt with in front of you before anything proceeds.
Three starting positions people actually arrive with, and where the money goes first in each.
Per-lesion ablative work is the efficient buy here, because you are paying only for the scars you actually have. At ₩10,000 (≈ $5) each, a short list stays modest, and the field lines can be left out of the first round entirely.
Release earns its place first at ₩500,000 (≈ $355), because energy spent on an anchored floor is money spent twice. Needle radiofrequency follows at ₩250,000 (≈ $180) once the floor has been freed, usually at a later appointment.
A field line is the sensible first spend, since a full-face unit at ₩500,000 (≈ $355) does not multiply as the count rises. Per-lesion work is then held back for whatever still stands out once the background has evened.
Whichever case you recognise, say the number you are working with at the consultation. A director who knows the ceiling can order the sequence so the most useful line is bought first, and that is a better use of a limited budget than spreading it thinly across all four in one enthusiastic afternoon.
Four findings that stop a scar quote being written, and what is offered instead.
The risks that belong to the lines themselves are named at consent, every time: bruising and swelling after release, pinpoint crusting and days of redness after needle radiofrequency, and a longer healing window with pigment change possible after ablative work, more so on deeper skin tones. Comfort measures during a session are confirmed at your consultation and set to the area being treated.
Three-dimensional imaging under five light sources with AI analysis is read beside a hands-on examination, and it is what separates a countable pit from a continuous texture and a shadow from a real depression. The lesion count that drives your arithmetic is taken from that reading.
Release, needle radiofrequency, needle-free delivery and ablative laser are all in-house. Nothing is recommended because it is the only thing on the trolley, and where none of the four fits the finding, that answer is available too.
Scar sessions here are director-performed, and the doctor who marks the lesions is the one who quotes them and the one who sees you at review. A count read aloud by the person holding the pen is harder to inflate than one generated at a desk.


Director-performed treatment is a Dear promise — your procedure is planned and performed by the doctors below.





Real verified reviews from our Google Business Profile.
4.9★★★★★ 310 Google ReviewsThe clinic was very professional from start to finish. Doctor Jung was excellent and gentle with the treatment. I felt well looked after and everyone was outstanding. Happy with my service!
I've visited clinic for LDM procedure. I don't speak Korean, so there was an interpreter who assisted me while consulting. The staff was very attentive, they asked me every time before applying products/covering my face during the procedure and it went smoothly. Planning to visit the clini…
All the staff are kind, the doctor is professional. They recommended us the treatment that fit us best and last the longest. A very nice experience overall.
I did a hydrofacial, white/black head removal, and 1 day lasers. Really kind staff and reasonable prices. The only thing I would advise is that your first consultation is with a salesperson and you don’t see the doctor until after you decide what you want and after you pay.
Had a great experience here as a foreigner! The doctors and staff were knowledgeable, friendly, and not pushy. They made recommendations in my consultation and were happy to work within my budget.
Tell us roughly how long the scarring has been there, whether acne is still active, and the budget you are working to. Answered in English as soon as possible.
Five indexed entries are listed below, all of them concerned with fractional radiofrequency delivered through needles: a 2013 paper on atrophic facial acne scars in Asian skin, a 2023 split-face randomised trial setting fractional CO2 laser against microneedle radiofrequency in a single treatment, a 2022 observational study of 75 patients treated for enlarged facial pores, a 2022 meta-analysis covering acne and acne scarring, and a 2020 pilot split-face randomised study comparing two fractional radiofrequency approaches.
They are given as title, journal and year with a verifiable DOI. No response rate or outcome figure from any of them is reproduced here, and none of them says anything about what your own scars will cost or how they will answer.
References are provided for information — outcomes vary by individual and are assessed at your diagnosis.