Home
Doctors Pricing Cost FAQ Book a Consultation
ENES
Skin analysis room at Dear Clinic Cheongdam where baseline facial imaging is captured before a lifting plan
Dear Clinic · Results · Lifting
Reading Prime Results · Cheongdam, Gangnam

Ultherapy Prime Before and After in Cheongdam, Gangnam, Seoul

No photo pair is published here. What is published is the standard a Prime photo pair has to meet before it means anything — the timeline, the camera conditions and the disclosures.

Collagen response read over months Baseline captured on EVE Muse Open 365 days
Ask About Your Own Baseline See the Timeline
The short answer

How to read an Ultherapy Prime before-and-after pair

Focused ultrasound works at the SMAS layer and its effect arrives as new collagen, which takes time. A Prime photo pair is therefore only informative when the interval is stated, the camera conditions match, the treated zones and shot count are disclosed, and nothing else was done to the face in between.

Dear Clinic publishes no Ultherapy Prime gallery. Our audited photo archive holds no Prime case that meets the captioning standard the clinic applies to before-and-after images, and filling the gap with a photo from a different treatment would misname it. So this page does the other useful thing: it sets out how to judge any Prime pair you are shown, here or anywhere.

The treatment itself — depths, zones, imaging, aftercare — is documented on the Ultherapy Prime page, and the platform sits alongside the rest of the menu on the lifting and tightening hub. Prime is published at ₩400,000 (≈ $285) per 100 shots.

Ultherapy Prime lifting treatment in progress at Dear Clinic Cheongdam, with the ultrasound image on the console
A Prime session in progress. What it produces is judged months later, against a baseline taken before it.
Timeline

The collagen timeline a Prime photograph is judged against

Four windows, each one answering a different question. A pair shot in the wrong window answers none of them.

Window 01

The hours after the lines are placed

Mild flush, a pulling or tender feeling along treated lines, sometimes small bruises or raised welts. Nothing here is a result; it is the tissue responding to heat at depth.

Window 02

The first weeks after a Prime session

Early tightening may read to you before it reads to a camera. Swelling and settling are still in play, so a photograph taken now is measuring the wrong thing.

Window 03

The months collagen actually needs

Remodelling is slow, and the published MFU-V studies listed below assess their outcomes across months of follow-up. This is the window an honest comparison photograph belongs in.

Window 04

The maintenance question, a year on

How long an effect holds varies with skin, age and lifestyle. Any interval is set with your director at follow-up instead of promised in advance.

Individual results may vary, and the timeline above describes a pattern, and your face has not signed up to the calendar. If a pair you are looking at carries no interval at all — no "12 weeks", no "6 months" — then the single most important variable in it has been left out.

Camera Conditions

Angle, lighting and distance in a Prime comparison photograph

Jawline definition is the thing Prime is most often asked to change, and jawline definition is also the thing most easily faked by a camera. Tilt the chin down five degrees and a jawline sharpens. Move a light from front to side and the same cheek gains a contour it did not have. Step closer with a short lens and the face slims at the edges. None of that is collagen.

Same head position in both frames, with the chin angle held still, never nudged to flatter.
Same camera height, same distance, same lens — a wider or nearer shot reshapes the face on its own.
Same lighting setup and direction; side light invents contour, flat light removes it.
Same expression, both frames relaxed. A slight smile lifts the mid-face without any treatment at all.
No makeup, no filter, no retouching, and hair pulled back the same way in both.
A stated interval and a stated plan: which zones were mapped and how many shots they received.
Ultherapy Prime system at Dear Clinic Cheongdam, seen from the front with its treatment screen
The planning screen records what was treated. A photograph stripped of that context is an image and nothing more.
Fair Comparison

What a fair Ultherapy Prime comparison has to disclose

Camera conditions are the mechanical half. The other half is disclosure, and it is where most published pairs quietly fall apart. A pair earns its place only when it can answer these questions on its face: how long after treatment, how many shots and to which zones, and what else happened to that face in the meantime. A course of skin boosters, a filler session or eight kilos of weight loss between frames will change a jawline far more visibly than any lifting device, and a pair that does not mention them is not a Prime result.

Two further disclosures matter. The first is consent, which is why the archive a clinic can publish from is always smaller than the archive it holds. The second is that the same person under the same conditions is the only valid comparison — a different patient with a similar concern proves nothing about your own face, whatever the resemblance.

Risks belong in the same frame as results. Bruising and raised welts along treated lines occur. Numbness or tingling where a line runs near a nerve is uncommon and usually settles over weeks. Temporary weakness in one facial muscle has been reported after focused-ultrasound treatment and is rare. A gallery that shows only outcomes and names none of these has edited the picture before you ever see it.

Dear, Knowhow

How a Prime outcome is assessed at Dear Clinic

01 — DIAGNOSIS FIRST

The baseline is an instrument reading, not a memory

EVE Muse 3D capture with five-light-source AI analysis is made before the plan is drawn. It records laxity zone by zone at a fixed distance under fixed light, which is precisely what a phone photograph taken at home cannot do. At follow-up that baseline is what your director reads the change against.

02 — THE FULL ARSENAL

A result nobody can show you is not sold

Where the reading shows surface crepiness over an intact SMAS, we do not recommend Prime; radiofrequency answers that picture better, and a Thermage FLX or Density plan is priced for you instead. Choosing the platform that suits the layer is what makes any later photograph worth taking.

03 — DIRECTOR-PERFORMED

The same hands place the lines and read the outcome

Prime sessions are performed by our directors, Merz-certified as Ultherapy providers, and the follow-up is theirs too.

If You Are Visiting

Judging a Prime result when you are only in Seoul for a week

The change accrues long after most trips end, so plan for a remote follow-up. Book the session early in the stay, take your own comparison frames before you fly home using the conditions listed above, and repeat them at the same interval afterwards under the same window light. The clinic opens 365 days a year, Sundays and public holidays included, which usually means the scan and the session can share one afternoon instead of two separate trips across town.

Questions after you leave are answered in English by the same team that treated you. If something feels wrong before the assessment window closes, that goes on the follow-up call and not into a waiting game. The session itself is published at ₩400,000 (≈ $285) per 100 shots, and the count your map comes to is agreed before any of it starts.

Medical Team

Five doctors, one standard

Director-performed treatment is a Dear promise — your procedure is planned and performed by the doctors below.

Dr. Jemin Kim — Medical Director and Founder, Dear Clinic
Dr. Jemin Kim
Yonsei University College of Medicine
Medical Director · Founder
Dr. Sanghyun Lee — Director, Dear Clinic
Dr. Sanghyun Lee
Seoul National University College of Medicine
Director
Board-certified · Family Medicine
Dr. Seonhaeng Lee — Director of Aesthetic Medicine, Dear Clinic
Dr. Seonhaeng Lee
Chosun University College of Medicine · Residency, Samsung Medical Center
Director, Aesthetic Medicine
Dr. Daeun Jung — Director, Dear Clinic
Dr. Daeun Jung
Ajou University College of Medicine
Director
Board-certified · Family Medicine
Dr. Woojae Jung — Director of Aesthetic Medicine, Dear Clinic
Dr. Woojae Jung
Seoul National University — B.S. in Medicine
Director, Aesthetic Medicine
Patient Reviews

What our patients say

Real verified reviews from our Google Business Profile.

4.9★★★★★ 308 Google Reviews
FAQ

Reading Prime results, question by question

Does Dear Clinic publish Ultherapy Prime before-and-after photos?
Not on this page. The audited photo archive holds no Ultherapy Prime case meeting the captioning standard the clinic applies, and borrowing an image from another treatment would misname it. What we publish instead is the standard any Prime pair should meet.
When should an Ultherapy Prime photograph be taken to be meaningful?
After the collagen response has had months to accrue. Frames taken in the days following a session show something else. Early frames catch flush and swelling, which is a different phenomenon entirely. The published MFU-V literature assesses outcomes across months of follow-up for the same reason.
How soon do people notice anything after Prime?
Some tightening can be felt or seen early, and then the substantive change builds gradually. The pace varies between individuals, so the assessment interval is set with your director instead of being fixed in advance.
What camera conditions make a before-and-after pair trustworthy?
Identical head position, camera height, distance and lens; identical lighting direction; the same relaxed expression; no makeup, filter or retouching; and the same hairstyle. Change any one of those and the pair stops being a comparison.
Can a photograph prove Ultherapy Prime worked?
A single pair can suggest it. Proof needs the interval stated, the shot count and treated zones disclosed, and confirmation that no other treatment happened in between. Without those, a photograph is showing you a camera setting as much as a result.
Why do lifting galleries so often look dramatic?
Because jawline definition is unusually sensitive to chin angle and light direction. Tilting the chin down or moving a light to the side will sharpen a jawline in seconds, which is why matched conditions matter more here than on most treatments.
How many shots and which zones should a pair disclose?
Both, ideally. Prime is counted in 100-shot units and a map may cover jawline, mid-face, brow or neck in any combination, so a pair without the plan behind it leaves the most important variable unstated.
Should I take my own baseline photographs before treatment?
It helps, and it costs nothing. Use window light, keep the camera at eye level, take front and both profiles, and repeat the identical setup later. Your clinical baseline is the EVE Muse capture; your own frames are the version you can look at whenever you like.
Can a convincing gallery predict what my own face will do?
No outcome follows from a stranger’s photographs. Individual results vary with skin thickness, age, laxity pattern and lifestyle, and that is assessed at your own diagnosis instead of being inferred from a gallery.
What if the director decides Prime will not show a change on my face?
Then we do not recommend it. Surface laxity above an intact SMAS is a radiofrequency picture, and treating it with focused ultrasound would produce exactly the sort of photograph nobody wants to take afterwards.
Are side effects visible in the weeks between the two frames?
Sometimes. Bruising, small welts along the treated lines and a pulling sensation are the common ones, and they settle. Numbness or tingling near a treated nerve path is uncommon; temporary weakness in a single facial muscle is rare. Any of them is worth a call, and waiting it out is the weaker option.
Consultation

Start with a baseline reading

Tell us what you want changed and when you are in Seoul; we reply in English as soon as possible.

Scientific Evidence

What the literature measures when it measures MFU-V results

The four papers below are the reason this page talks about months instead of days. They examine intense focused ultrasound tightening in Asian skin with histological findings, a quantitative analysis of face and neck tightening in Asian patients, micro-focused ultrasound with visualization for tightening and lifting, and the wider field of noninvasive ultrasound techniques.

Two of them study Asian cohorts specifically, which is the relevant comparison for treatment planned in Seoul. They are cited here as sources for the mechanism and its assessment intervals; no specific outcome is being forecast for any individual from them.

  1. Suh D et al. Intense Focused Ultrasound Tightening in Asian Skin: Clinical and Pathologic Results. Dermatologic Surgery. 2011. doi:10.1111/j.1524-4725.2011.02094.x
  2. Lu P et al. Quantitative Analysis of Face and Neck Skin Tightening by Microfocused Ultrasound With Visualization in Asians. Dermatologic Surgery. 2017. doi:10.1097/dss.0000000000001181
  3. Fabi S. Microfocused Ultrasound With Visualization for Skin Tightening and Lifting. Dermatologic Surgery. 2014. doi:10.1097/dss.0000000000000233
  4. Guillen Fabi S. Noninvasive skin tightening: focus on new ultrasound techniques. Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology. 2015. doi:10.2147/ccid.s69118
Book WhatsApp Call